Common API Mistakes Developers Hate — And How to Avoid Them Like a Pro

June 11, 2025

Alina Orel

Whether you’re building public APIs or internal endpoints for your team, one thing is certain: a badly designed API can turn collaboration into chaos. Great APIs are intuitive, consistent, and predictable — the rest? Frustrating at best, infuriating at worst.

Let’s dive into the 5 API mistakes that will make your fellow devs hate you — and more importantly, how to avoid them like a pro.

1. Ignoring Consistent Naming Conventions

The Mistake: Mixing camelCase, snake_case, and PascalCase in the same API. Worse, using vague or misleading names like /getStuff or /doThing.

Why It Hurts: Inconsistent naming forces devs to slow down and second-guess your structure. It makes automation and client SDKs harder to maintain.

🗝️Do It Like a Pro:

  • Pick a standard (camelCase for JSON keys, kebab-case or snake_case for URLs) and stick to it.
  • Use clear, descriptive names like /users/{id}/orders instead of /getData.

Pro Tip: Use OpenAPI/Swagger to define and validate consistency across your endpoints.

2. Overloading a Single Endpoint to Do Everything

The Mistake: Creating one mega endpoint like /api/action that behaves differently based on the payload — sometimes it updates, sometimes it deletes, depending on which parameters are passed.

Why It Hurts: It’s impossible to predict behavior without reading the docs (if they even exist). It also breaks REST principles.

🗝️Do It Like a Pro:

  • Separate endpoints by responsibility:
    • GET /users → Fetch users
    • POST /users → Create a user
    • DELETE /users/{id} → Delete a user
  • Make use of proper HTTP verbs instead of action-based names (/deleteUser = 🚩).
3. Leaving Out Versioning

The Mistake: Deploying an API without versioning. Then changing how it works later — breaking every existing integration.

Why It Hurts: Changes become nightmares. Your team can’t safely refactor, and users can’t trust the API.

🗝️Do It Like a Pro:

  • Always include versioning from the start. Even v1 matters:
    https://api.example.com/v1/users
  • Use URL versioning or headers, and deprecate old versions gradually.

Pro Tip: Communicate breaking changes clearly and give teams time to migrate.

4. Returning 200 OK for Everything (Even Errors)

The Mistake: No matter what happens — success, validation error, server crash — your API returns 200 OK.

Why It Hurts: Clients can’t rely on status codes to handle errors properly. It leads to defensive programming and guesswork.

🗝️Do It Like a Pro:

  • Use appropriate HTTP status codes:
    • 200 OK for success
    • 400 Bad Request for validation issues
    • 401 Unauthorized or 403 Forbidden for access errors
    • 500 Internal Server Error when things break
  • Include a meaningful error payload:
5. Writing Poor (or No) Documentation

The Mistake: Expecting your API to be self-explanatory. Spoiler: It’s not.

Why It Hurts: Other devs waste hours reverse-engineering your endpoints or pinging you constantly on Slack for help.

🗝️Do It Like a Pro:

  • Use tools like Swagger, Redoc, or Postman to document:
    • Available endpoints
    • Expected payloads
    • Sample responses
    • Authentication info
  • Update your docs as part of your deployment pipeline — not “later”.
TL;DR — The Quick Fix List
MistakeFix
Inconsistent namingStandardize casing and semantics
Overloaded endpointsFollow RESTful patterns
No versioningAlways include /v1/ or headers
Always returning 200Use proper HTTP status codes
No documentationAuto-generate with Swagger/Postman

Your API is more than just a set of endpoints — it’s a product. Whether it’s for your team or thousands of developers worldwide, clarity and consistency matter.

Build like someone else is going to maintain it — because they probably will.

We are happy to help https://synpass.pro/contactsynpass/ 🤝